![foxconn n15235 1.01 foxconn n15235 1.01](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/wG8AAOSw1T9hBBcw/s-l300.jpg)
Foxconn n15235 1.01 windows#
They always have Firewire built in and tend to it on peripherals, while Windows users often make do with USB until they get into music or video editing when they then find the need for Firewire and hit this poor performance just when they start needing mission critical performance. I suggest, also, that poor Firewire performance in Windows is more important than poor USB on Macs. I suspect these data rates you keep publishing are ones we will actually never see.
![foxconn n15235 1.01 foxconn n15235 1.01](https://support.hp.com/doc-images/1009/c02978496.jpg)
That's what most people actually do when the backup, so that's what we need to see in order to make informed choices. Given the importance of Firewire in multimedia applications, for which it can be critical, does this poor performance not warrant a mention?Ĭan we please have some real world figures for USB 2.0, eSATA and Firewire 400/800 transfers under default settings and off an internal 7200 HDD you standardize on. Intel Macs have improved it but that takes it from around 136Mb/s to 168Mb/s. Without the perfect conditions of a RAM disk, and without cacheing turned off, they get real world performance of up to:įirewire 400: 304 Mb/s (31% faster than PC)įirewire 800: 464 Mb/s (41% faster than PC)įor comparison, Macs are getting lousy USB 2 performance. It is known that Macs have poor USB 2 performance but look at the Firewire results by Barefeats: I was wondering why the Firewire performance is so poor in these reviews:įirewire 400 gets a best throughput of 230.6Mb/s
Foxconn n15235 1.01 series#
The 3DMark series of benchmarks developed and provided by Futuremark are among the most widely used tools for benchmark reporting and comparisons. Our video tests are run at 1280x1024 resolution for this article at standard settings. We did find in testing that applying a 4xAA/8xAF setting in most of today's latest games created a situation where the performance of the system starts becoming GPU limited. We are utilizing the MSI X1950XTX video card to ensure our 1280x1024 resolutions are not completely GPU bound for our motherboard test results. Our memory timings are set based upon determining the best memory bandwidth via our test application results. Our choice of DDR2-800 memory from GEIL offered a very wide range of memory settings during our stock and overclocked test runs. Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 (Intel P965 C2) - BIOS F6Ī 2GB memory configuration is now standard in the AT test bed as most enthusiasts are currently purchasing this amount of memory.
![foxconn n15235 1.01 foxconn n15235 1.01](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/u3UAAOSwUUJfedz~/s-l300.jpg)
Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 (Intel P965 C2) - BIOS F7
![foxconn n15235 1.01 foxconn n15235 1.01](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/Hb14cdd436b5c4b81bd107d86524eecf6s.jpg)
We chose an E6300 for testing as we feel this will be a very popular Core 2 Duo CPU choice with the P965 motherboards, and particularly with budget priced offerings like this Foxconn board. Our Foxconn motherboard fully supports the current range of socket 775 Intel processors.